Analyst target moves and gaps

The latest analyst price-target changes and the widest price-to-target gaps in our US coverage.

Price-target changes and the widest gaps between price and consensus target across our US coverage. Analyst numbers are one input among many — the interesting part is when they move, not where they stand.

Scan of 2026-09-17 · 17 signals in this view · the live board carries the ranked daily cards and the daily archive keeps every previous day.

#	Name	Signal	The engine's read	Move	Region
1	FLNC Fluence Energy	analyst target move	RBC Capital cut its price target to $4 from $15 (2026-09-17).	-15.4%	US
2	ARM ARM Holdings	analyst gap	41.5% off its high — yet the $363 consensus implies +37.1%.	+8.6%	US
3	ORCL Oracle	analyst gap	55.8% off its high — yet the $237 consensus implies +55.9%.	+6.0%	US
4	MU Micron Technology	analyst gap	22.1% off its high — yet the $1548 consensus implies +58.3%.	+5.5%	US
5	AVAV AeroVironment	analyst target move	Goldman Sachs lifted its price target to $326 from $285 (2026-09-17).	+4.4%	US
6	CRM Salesforce	analyst target move	BMO Capital lifted its price target to $285 from $260 (2026-09-17).	-2.9%	US
7	NVDA NVIDIA	analyst gap	Near its high — yet the $345 consensus implies +57.4%.	+2.5%	US
8	AVGO Broadcom	analyst gap	29.8% off its high — yet the $510 consensus implies +46.7%.	+2.3%	US
9	ASML ASML	analyst gap	18.5% off its high — yet the $2306 consensus implies +41.5%.	+1.7%	US
10	APP AppLovin	analyst gap	56.9% off its high — yet the $532 consensus implies +65.5%.	-1.5%	US
11	APH Amphenol	analyst gap	12.2% off its high — yet the $178 consensus implies +126.9%.	+1.4%	US
12	GOOGL Alphabet	analyst target move	Tigress Financial lifted its price target to $485 from $415 (2026-09-17).	+1.3%	US
13	OKTA Okta	analyst target move	BTIG lifted its price target to $219 from $187 (2026-09-17).	+1.0%	US
14	VRT Vertiv	analyst gap	36.4% off its high — yet the $369 consensus implies +52.7%.	+0.9%	US
15	AMAT Applied Materials	analyst gap	43.6% off its high — yet the $666 consensus implies +59.6%.	+0.5%	US
16	LRCX Lam Research	analyst gap	38.6% off its high — yet the $376 consensus implies +39.6%.	+0.0%	US
17	GEV GE Vernova	analyst gap	22.7% off its high — yet the $1266 consensus implies +36.9%.	+0.0%	US

Move = last-session change at the scan. Each row's read is the engine's own one-liner, frozen at the 2026-09-17 close.

Go deeper

Click any name for its full page — chart, performance, signals and the Closelook read in one place.
The Directional Flow ranking grades trend quality across the whole coverage — signals here often show up there a few days later.
The Flow × Technicals ranking crosses trend scores with the same moving-average conditions this board flags.
The daily archive keeps every board day — how the signal mix looked on any past date.

FAQ

What is the Tech Signal Board?

Our nightly scanner reads every covered name after each close and flags what changed — big moves, trend-condition changes, stretched oscillators, drawdown classifications and analyst moves. The board is the ranked daily surface; these views group the same signals by the question they answer.

What counts as a signal on this page?

This view collects the scanner's analyst target move, analyst gap signals. Each row states the engine's one-line read — what was flagged and why.

How often does this update?

The scanner runs after every US close; this page is rebuilt every market morning from that scan and always shows the date it was built from. The daily archive keeps every previous board day.

Is this investment advice?

No. Closelook publishes an investment research diary, not investment advice. Signals describe what our engine measures in past prices. Past performance may not be an indication of future performance.

Closelook publishes an investment research diary, not investment advice. Past performance may not be an indication of future performance.