Mag Pulse · daily board · the Six plus the Torque · as of Jul 31, 2026

Mag Pulse

One question, answered daily: is the hyperscaler cohort turning? The Mag complex spent ~19 months going sideways on capex fear while nearly every benchmark ran. This week's cloud prints put booked demand against that fear — this board keeps the score. Six names in three cohorts, one torque row, and the popular instrument (MAGS) as the shared price frame. Tesla is excluded by methodology.

The regime-turn line Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI · equal-weight · indexed 1y

0.981.161.33 25-0825-1126-0226-05 1.27
1D +12.12%1W +24.01%1M +8.36%1Y +16.05%

Rising = the market pays the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort. The line is the board's headline read: a durable turn here is what "the discount is closing" looks like in price.

The MAGS map popular-instrument foil · standing levels

69.50 shelf 62.56 pivot ~56 trend 25-0825-1126-0226-0526-08 68.38
Close 68.38 to 69.50 +1.64% to 62.56 -8.51% to ~56 -18.10%

Ten-month compression: flat top at the 69.50 supply shelf (two rejections), rising floor on the multi-year trendline (~56, hand-set monthly), pivot 62.56 = the Dec-2024 top on price. Levels first, story second.

The cohorts

Hyperscalers
1D +8.17%1W +15.41%1M +7.29%1Y +29.67%
1Y vs QQQ: +5.17%

MSFT · AMZN · GOOGL — the thesis longs: does the cohort close the gap?

Consumer-AI
1D -3.52%1W -6.94%1M -0.99%1Y +11.75%
1Y vs QQQ: -12.75%

META · AAPL — not yet in the build-out cycle; edge-AI optionality

Supplier
1D +2.93%1W -2.94%1M +1.60%1Y +12.13%
1Y vs QQQ: -12.37%

NVDA — the anchor between build-out and deployment

Torque
1D +1.81%1W +12.94%1M -8.55%1Y -47.77%
1Y vs QQQ: -72.27%

ORCL — highest-beta hyperscaler pivot; thesis amplifier both ways

The Six absolute + relative, Jul 31, 2026 close

Name Cohort Close 1D1W1M1Y 1Y vs QQQ 1Y vs MAGS Record
MSFT Hyperscalers 464.72 +3.02%+21.75%+20.93%-8.93% -33.43% -27.35% print record
AMZN Hyperscalers 284.02 +4.58%+22.75%+17.04%+21.32% -3.18% +2.90% print record
GOOGL Hyperscalers 356.13 +6.73%+11.38%-1.41%+81.62% +57.12% +63.20% print record
META Consumer-AI 556.71 +3.28%-6.47%-9.17%-19.73% -44.23% -38.15% print record
AAPL Consumer-AI 303.42 -1.78%-9.94%-1.69%+46.62% +22.12% +28.20% print record
NVDA Supplier 200.75 +2.93%-2.94%+1.60%+12.13% -12.37% -6.29% print record

The Torque · ORCL separated by design — the thesis amplifier, both ways

Close 129.87 1D +1.81% · 1W +12.94% · 1M -8.55% · 1Y -47.77%
Below the Sep-2025 high -59.99% high 324.63 on 2025-09-10 — the deepest drawdown in the complex
1M realized vol 61.1% cohort median 53.2% — the most volatile seat at the table

The torque: hyperscaler-since-recently, declined the most, most volatile in both directions. If the thesis holds, the biggest move lives here.

Benchmarks the field the Six are measured against

Instrument Close 1D1W1M1Y
QQQ 700.07 +1.76%+2.63%-1.76%+24.50%
SPY 757.67 +1.42%+2.51%+1.73%+21.20%
SOXX 507.68 +0.55%-1.66%-10.35%+112.49%
XLK 178.04 +1.53%+2.15%-1.41%+36.24%
IGV 97.42 +3.00%+7.16%+4.11%-12.74%
MAGS · the foil 68.38 +3.67%+8.52%+5.04%+18.42%

The thesis layer the standing read per name — editorial, updated on evidence

MSFT

The capex-fear discount, refuted where it was priced deepest: Azure +43%, $678B backlog — the market paid the print +15% in a day.

AMZN

AWS re-accelerated to +37% — the demand witness. The biggest print reaction in its record parked it directly under the all-time-high line.

GOOGL

The straddle: cloud yes, search disruption already visible — and AI replacement monetizes less well. Re-rated in sympathy without printing.

META

Excellent at AI-for-ads — but that is not genAI. Charged hardest of the Six for strategy-push capex without a booked-demand anchor.

AAPL

Waiting to monetize reach, with the tail risk that a new AI interface takes reach away from mobile. The cost repricing hit its margin story first.

NVDA

The supplier both cohorts pay either way — priced on workloads, not orders; the boundary name between build-out and deployment.

Methodology

Universe: six Mag names in three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL), Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle as a visually separated torque row. Tesla is excluded by stated methodology: not a Mag company for this monitor — its price is set by autonomy and robotics narratives, not by the cloud/AI build-out economics this board measures.

Computation: cohort composites are equal-weight within cohort. All windows (1D/1W/1M/1Y) are trading-day windows on adjusted closes. Relatives are simple return differences against each benchmark (QQQ, SPY, SOXX, XLK, IGV) plus MAGS as the popular-instrument foil. The headline line is the hyperscaler composite divided by the consumer-AI composite, indexed over one year — the regime-turn detector.

The MAGS map is a standing frame, not a computed one: the 69.50 supply shelf and 62.56 pivot (the Dec-17-2024 top on price basis) are fixed levels; the multi-year trendline (~56) is hand-set and updated monthly.

Data: equities from the Closelook data lake; benchmark ETFs from EODHD. Refreshed nightly after the US close (22:30 UTC, Mon–Fri).

This board is a diary entry on our process. Closelook publishes research, not investment advice.