Randstad NV (RAND.AS) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

52 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 70
Quality 22
Growth 45
Balance sheet 45
Cash quality 65
Capital allocation 62
Momentum 87

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

3.05 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the safe zone (above 2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

6/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.70 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the RAND.AS chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Randstad NV's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 52/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 70, quality 22, growth 45, balance sheet 45, cash quality 65, capital allocation 62, momentum 87. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Randstad NV's Altman Z-Score?

3.05, which sits in the safe zone (above 2.99) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Randstad NV's Piotroski F-Score?

6 of 9, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Randstad NV's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.70 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.